Profile meaning
The canonical report translates the completed CQI result into bounded working-style and reflection guidance.
CQI methodology preview
From visual response to practical reflection.
CQI combines a visual-first assessment experience, deterministic scoring, result clarification, and a staged profile lifecycle. This page explains what the current application does and where supporting evidence remains under review.
Current product modelEvidence-aware
Visual interval
Observe the scene before answer text appears.
Participant choice
Record the selected option and its configured scoring evidence.
Meaning layer
Translate completed results into bounded report guidance.
Lifecycle
Separate a developing theory, anchored type, and changing state.
Assessment journey
A staged process, not a single permanent label
Each step has a different job. Clarification finishes an individual result, later assessments add longitudinal evidence, and check-ins refresh state after the type is anchored.
- 01
Intake
Optional preferences help tailor the format and tone of later guidance without changing the CQI result.
- 02
Initial CQI
The first completed assessment produces a leading pattern that remains a working theory.
- 03
Result clarification
When needed, a short fixed-choice question set resolves ambiguity within the current assessment result.
- 04
Follow-up and final
Later assessments add evidence and test whether the leading pattern remains consistent across time.
- 05
Lock and check-ins
After confirmation, the anchored type remains stable while check-ins refresh current-state guidance.
Report architecture
One canonical meaning layer, two visibility modes
The report engine derives bounded narrative from the completed result and approved personalization summaries. Sharing creates a frozen sanitized snapshot rather than exposing the private live view.
Personalization
Approved preference summaries can shape examples, learning formats, and support language without changing profile assignment.
Private and shared views
Private reports can include current-state context. Shared snapshots remove that private detail and preserve a sanitized view.
Interpretation boundaries
What CQI is designed to support - and what it is not
These boundaries apply even when a report is private or a participant explicitly consents to personalization.
A reflection framework
CQI describes patterns and preferences that a participant can accept, reject, or refine with lived context.
Not a clinical instrument
CQI reports are not medical, psychological, diagnostic, or treatment assessments.
Not an employment decision tool
CQI reports should not be used for hiring, firing, promotion, compensation, or candidate selection.
No direct biological measurement
The application does not measure neurotransmitter, hormone, imaging, or laboratory values.
Evidence roadmap
Reserved space for reviewed methodology and science
The technical page and navigation are ready now. Each evidence area can be activated independently after source, scope, and interpretation review.
Evidence review placeholder
Methodology documentation
Assessment construction, administration, scoring boundaries, and lifecycle documentation are being prepared for publication.
Evidence review placeholder
Reliability and validity
Any future metrics will appear only with a named dataset, method, date, sample context, and approved interpretation.
Evidence review placeholder
Framework visuals
Charts and biological-framework diagrams remain reserved until their labels, evidence basis, and limitations are approved.